<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Robert Schalkenbach Foundation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://schalkenbach.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://schalkenbach.org</link>
	<description>Publisher of Henry George and Related Works - Advocate For Economic Justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Georgism and the Decline of Liberalism in Interwar Britain by Andrew Ashurst</title>
		<link>http://schalkenbach.org/georgism-and-the-decline-of-liberalism-in-interwar-britain/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ashurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schalkenbach.org/#comment-571</guid>
		<description>I have not had time to read this at first sitting, might an executive summary be useful (or an abstract to be more traditional I suppose) .

The subject is fascinating and at last I have an understanding of what happened to the Liberals. Georgism and LVT is essential to that understanding. I was completely unaware of Georgism until about a year ago as many, no, most, still are but it solves the puzzle. It never seemed to me that the rise of the Labour Party alone was enough to explain what happened to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not had time to read this at first sitting, might an executive summary be useful (or an abstract to be more traditional I suppose) .</p>
<p>The subject is fascinating and at last I have an understanding of what happened to the Liberals. Georgism and LVT is essential to that understanding. I was completely unaware of Georgism until about a year ago as many, no, most, still are but it solves the puzzle. It never seemed to me that the rise of the Labour Party alone was enough to explain what happened to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Standard Volume 1 January 8, 1887 by Wyn Achenbaum</title>
		<link>http://schalkenbach.org/standard-volume-1-january-8-1887/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyn Achenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 20:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schalkenbach.org/?page_id=2582#comment-538</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting this.  What a resource it is! I have in mind that the first issue was 8 pages; the text fills 80 pages when I put it into a PDF. 

Many names which surface later in the movement show up here -- Thomas Shearman, John Codman, Judge Maguire, 

&quot;The Standard&quot; was in some senses an outgrowth of the NYC Mayoral election of the preceding November.

I look forward to additional issues!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this.  What a resource it is! I have in mind that the first issue was 8 pages; the text fills 80 pages when I put it into a PDF. </p>
<p>Many names which surface later in the movement show up here &#8212; Thomas Shearman, John Codman, Judge Maguire, </p>
<p>&#8220;The Standard&#8221; was in some senses an outgrowth of the NYC Mayoral election of the preceding November.</p>
<p>I look forward to additional issues!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

